Sunday, December 6, 2009
Lab 19 Wrap-Up
The final is 7:30 December 7 in PS 306, where we met for the last class. I have all your presentations and we'll project them on the screen. My plan is to have a book or CD with all the presentations as a class momento. If you would like to invite anyone along, please feel free to do so. In the meantime, best wishes for success in your other classes' finals. I hope getting the presentations fully prepared early helped there.
Lastly, Dr. Terebey and I will be conducting a quantum optics experiment starting next quarter on photon orbital angular momenta - if you are interested in participating, please see her. It will involve a Mach-Zehnder setup on the table, some new components, mounts, digital data taking, and hopefully some fun results that may lead to further work on orbital angular momentum spectroscopy of natural photon streams.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Lab 18 Prep / Materials
Today is lab notebook review for those who don't have a "bye".
The table will be open until 7:50.
Some possibilities for work on the table during class time include: a Sagnac (ring laser) interferometer; a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a microscope slide in one arm to generate path differences and fringe modulation, solutions to various made-up alignment puzzles, michelson fringe imaging w/ the camera to assess wavefront error.
After 7:50 there is a holography experiment scheduled on the table that needs the room dark.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Lab 17 Wrap Up
Aligning optics on a table is a little like riding a bicycle. After a while your body just "gets it" as you learn the effect of exercising each of the many degrees of freedom in an optic's mount. Of course you need to have an overall alignment strategy as well, such as working optic by optic down-beam. In this alignment, the "aha" moment is when you translate and rotate the mirror at the same time, keeping the location "A" constant. Having a second location "B" helps a lot.
We learned several other alignment tricks. "Chopping" a card in and out of beam rapdily by hand as the card is moved downstream gives a strong and fairly persistent visual impression of the beam's location in 3D akin to as if there were smoke or mist to mark the beam's location. This trick is especially helpful if there are features (bolt-hole row, tape w/ line down middle) on the table showing the direction the beam should go. I'll post up the other trick later.
Here are some in-progress alignment photos:
This one showing mirror translation along a bolt-hole row, and below, showing by-eye alignment looking down a bolt-hole row from one end of the table to make sure everything is in the right place. It is amazing how important it is to keep moving around the table and eye-balling optic locations! It is just too darned easy to plop things down off-by-one because of the repetitive pattern on the table top.
Oh, by the way, the fringes were good:
I'll hold open lab Friday 1PM on.
Good Thanksgiving everyone!
Lab 17
Above: Team "Monday MZ" fringes from their Mach-Zehnder interferometer.
Look ahead:
Your FINAL presentation in digital or (scannable) paper form is due next Wednesday, December 2.
Your DRAFT presentation (slide titles and content identified) is due next Monday, November 30.
Your lab notebooks will be reviewed Monday (Lab 18). Some of you have byes on this for having stupendous notebooks last time and already have full credit on this score.
Prep today will be a status on your presentations:
Lab work begun
Lab work finished
Lab work written up
Presentation slide titles complete
Presentation draft content complete
Presentation final content complete
Remember that I will be reviewing your lab notebook at the time of the presentations.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Lab 16 Materials
Lab 16: Mach-Zehnder Interferometer
Self-Assessment (note addition of more of/less of items)
Today and Wednesday we'll break into 2 groups. One group will build a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, and the other will learn optics cleaning techniques. Then on Wednesday we'll switch. The interferometer build will take 1-2 hours.
Here's a pdf with optics cleaning instructions:
Meilse Griot cleaning instructions.
Because of the importance of minimizing damage to an optic's surface, cleaning is done very carefully. Many years of experience has developed a practical and safe approach. The key ingredient is patience and losing all desire to rush. A little practice helps too.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Lab 16 Prep
I have a pile of photos from Friday's open lab. Too many to email or upload. Instead I'll burn them to CDs and bring them to lab. I note, however, that with 5 dozen photos it is hard to keep track. My advice for future photo taking is that you write a little placard to appear in the frame when the photo is taken to identify it better.
I'll post up this one photo though. It was the highlight of the day when Sy's Mach-Zehnder interferometer gave fringes.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Lab 15 Materials
1) Demonstrate preparedness
2) Quantum optics snippit - polarization tagging
3) One-on-one presentation topic & plan review
4) Open Lab w/ Michelson layout & polarizers
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Lab 15 Prep
1) Write a paragraph (or more) describing your plan for the final presentation. Your plan should include a short technical description, an estimate of the amount of table time you will need, and a timeline for accomplishing the project. Refer to the presentation rules given during lab 12. Key dates are: presentation is evening of 12/7 and a hardcopy/digital version is due on the last day of class. I will spend about 10 minutes with each of you discussing your project during lab 15.
2) Review your lab notes for the last experiment, where we polarization tagged the arms of a Michelson interferometer. Generate a 1-page description of the experiment and the results. Make a note of something you would like to try differently or in addition. Write a simple procedure for doing that and incorporate it into your table work during the open lab.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Lab 14 Material Available
Lab 14 Materials
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Lab 14 Prep Package Available
...in which you will further explore the Michelson interferometer, including a quantum mechanical calculation of its fringe pattern.
Lab 13 Photos
Team A planning their buildup and alignments. The team came up with a perforated card as an alignment aid that was used to ensure the beam was a constant height above the table.
Team B doing their layout. Fringes obtained at t=1 hour using shimmed and hand-touch alignments. Not bad!
Monday, November 9, 2009
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Lab 13 Prep Package Available
Lab 13 Prep Package
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Lab 12 Materials Available
Lab 12 Plan of the Day
"Final" presentation rules and procedures
Self-Assessment
Please record on your self assessment what you want more of and what you want less of in the lab.
Lab 12 Prep
Lab 11 Photos
A little elbow grease and damp sponges cleaned off most of the external gunk. Once in the lab, we took out the mirror and found the aluminum coating to be in bad shape. Certainly time for it to be recoated. But first, we'll have fun with it doing a Foucault test to check its figure. Mirrors with pretty bad optical surfaces can still produce images.
A Foucault test is an optical test at center of curvature, often used by amateur telescope makers while "figuring" a mirror to its final shape. The test uses simple equipment to assess the shape of the mirror to within 1/4 wavelength of light or so. It is not as accurate as surface metrology done with an interferometer, but instead of needing $50,000 worth of equipment, you can use stuff that is probably lying around the house. Or lab.
We upgraded the usual Foucault instrument to include a CCD camera to capture the upstream view of the mirror for all to view. In the "classic" Foucault test the procedure is to eyeball it.
Here you see the LED gooseneck lamp that is illuminating a slightly off-axis frosted 1 mm diaphram opening. The frosting is achieved with a piece of Scotch-brand magic tape. This diffuse light source in turn illuminates the mirror, which is located two focal lengths (1 radius of curvature) downstream. Near the focus is a probe on a mounting post. A knife edge is often used. We used a chisel from the toolbox since it comes with a built-in handle for mounting. Later on, Jacob suggested using a pin instead and swapped out the chisel for a mechanical pencil with its 700 micron diameter lead extended, which is what you see here:
Looking upstream from before the pencil, here's what the cell phone camera captured. The bright light on the telescope mirror is the out-of-focus image of the frosted diaphragm, which is located behind and to the left of the camera. To take this picture, I moved the camera until I could see the image of the frosted diaphragm go into the lens of the camera.
Of course, it's not really an experiment without data, so here's the data off the camera when the probe is inserted at a point very near the focus. A perfect mirror would show a uniform disk with varying brightness as the probe was moved to the focal point. But an imperfect mirror doesn't focus all the light at the focal point, some misses. So with the probe at the focal point, the light that misses keeps on going and enters the camera. What you can see here is that the light coming from the edges of the mirror is not blocked, while the light coming off the center is mostly blocked.
The outer edge has a different focal length, by a small amount (several mm) than the middle. By playing with the probe, Paul found that the edge rays came to a focus farther out, so the edge of the mirror has a longer radius of curvature than the middle. This so-called "turned-down-edge" is a common aberration in amateur-class telescopes. The amount present here is pretty small, and probably doesn't noticeably affect image quality for visual observations with this telescope.
Finally, some boardwork on the Zernike functions used to describe aberrations of optical systems. These functions, defined over the unit circle in RxR, form a linear vector space much like sines and cosines do. An arbitrary function on the unit disk can be written as a linear combination of Zernikes. The usefulness comes from the ability to map physical effects onto Zernikes when doing "forensics" in an effort to understand and potentially correct aberrations. Low order terms correspond to mis-pointing, out-of-focus, off-axis, and mount-induced aberrations.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Lab 11 Prep Package Available
Wednesday will be lab notebook review, so be sure to bring yours. We will be making improvement agreements.
There will be open lab this Friday 1PM-5PM.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Lab 10 Materials Available
Lab 10 Plan of the Day
Self-Assessment
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Lab 9 Error Budgets & Chopping
If you want to add additional data you recorded to this spreadsheet, drop Julian a note (or me and I will forward).
Lab 9 was all about error budgeting an experiment. An error budget not only is a guide to understanding the sources of uncertainty in an experiment once you have data in hand, but it is also a powerful tool in experiment design. Once you know the big contributors, you can spend some effort to make them smaller, improving the overall experiment. Where's Waldo the Error Budget in this picture?
In experiment 9, chopping was an important technique in reducing noise introduced by drifts. Here is some chopping in action as Jillian alternately allows a polarized and unpolarized beam to be sensed on the photometer in order to assess the noise introduced by laser polarization and intensity drifts.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Friday, October 23, 2009
Lab 8 Material Available
Lab 8 Materials - Quantitative Polarization
Self-Assessment Form
I hugely enjoyed this lab - preparing it, and watching you execute it. The teamwork both teams showed as you all worked beautifully together to get high-quality experimental results. It is clear that you all know and respect each other well enough to easily organize yourselves to complete a complex task. My hat is off to you all.
Julian sent me his team's data spreadsheet for sharing:
Team Julian Lab 8 Spreadsheet
Here is what the data looks like (blue squares) compared to a cos^2 law with a phase shift and amplitude that best "fits by eye" (red line).
The data clearly validates the model, Malus' law to within a few percent. A detailed study of this experimental dataset could be done to determine the degree to which the cos^2 law matches the data, perhaps someone will undertake this quantitative task. Also instructive would be a plot showing the uncorrected-for-drifts readings vs angle and the cos^2 law. Since the input beam intensity varied by 40%, the comparison would be graphic in showing the value of performing a chopping experiment. Instrumental drifts are invariably present at some level in every experiment. An experiment seeking the best possible sensitivity must take these drifts into account.
Above is a snapshot of the 2 polarizers with their mounts "blocked" using 1/4-20 bolts in the table to achieve a relatively repeatable position. This technique facilitates rapidly moving each polarizer out of the beam and back in at will without having to fuss much about obtaining correct placement. Just push it (gently) up against the blocking bolts.
Team John emailed me as well. Here is that team's data:
Team John Lab 8 Spreadsheet
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Lab 8 Prep Package Available
Lab 8 will be a quantitative experiment to determine the angular dependence of the intensity of polarized light transmitted by a polarizing filter. To generate quantitative measurements we will be using the Photometer:
I will be catching a plane right after class, so we will be closing up at 8:30 PM, a little earlier than usual. On Monday, I'll open the lab up an hour early (5 PM) so you can continue any work that was left undone.
Lab 7 Wrap-up
LOL Labz
U r makin' me haz seen the lite!
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Lab 7 Materials Available
Lab 7 Plan of the Day
Lab 7 Materials
Self-Assessment
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Lab 6 Notes on Notebooks
1. There is a wide range in style.
2. There is a wide range in quality.
3. Not everyone seemed satisfied with their notebooks.
4. Here's a strategy for improving your notebook:
--- Refer to the checklist in the material for Lab 1.
--- Review your notebook against the checklist.
--- Pick an area to improve.
--- Spend extra effort on that area until you see improvement.
--- Iterate.
5. Not many notebooks recorded lab procedures. These are necessary to reproduce a result.
6. Good notebooks can save you in the future from extra work redoing stuff that you just didn't bother to record. Get in the habit of recording everything that makes sense, especially puzzling facts.
I will review lab notebooks in class again. At that time we will make "improvement contracts". In the meantime, use the feedback provided and these comments as an opportunity to improve your practices. Out in the wild you will find it necessary to keep good lab records in order to make reliable progress on a project and be confident of the results.
Lab 7 Prep Package Available
Note that you will design an experiment and write the procedure for executing it. If you have or can borrow some polarizing sunglasses, bring them to class.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Lab 5 Fringes - Cell Phone Photos
Reflection geometry. Each reflection is about 4% as intense as incoming beam I. Not shown is the transmitted beam T that continues downward to the left.
The fringe orientation is due to the wedge orientation. In lab we rotated a slide to see that the "clock" angle of the fringes is tied to the slide, not to the rest of the optics.
We also tested what would happen if we overlapped the fringe pattern from one experiment bay on top of the beam from another experiment bay. Additional fringes or no additional fringes? At first sight we didn't see evidence for additional fringing - the pattern looked like the straight addition of the 2 fringe patterns rather than the interference of those 2 fringe patterns. Remember that the number of fringes is related to the angle between the two beams, with about 5 fringes per mrad. The two beams were incident at an angle of several hundred mrad, so there were of order a thousand of these new fringes across the pattern -- too many to resolve since there's more than one fringe per camera pixel. So we didn't see much new. If we had inserted some clever optics to overlay the two beams with a small, mrad sized, angle between them (like is done when you use 2 stacked slides), then what would we have seen at the detector/screen?
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Lab 6 Prep Package Available
During Lab 6 I will review lab notebooks for feedback. Also, we will begin designing our precision tip-tilt stage for the precision interferometer experiments. Finally, there will be open lab.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Lab 5 Materials Available
Lab 5 Plan of the Day
Lab 5 Microscope slide interference and metrology
Self-Assessment
This is the material that we will cover in the lab. It is different from the preparation package in the previous post. Do not confuse the lab materials with the preparation package!
On Wednesday the lab will include notebook review. Be sure you are all caught up with your notes and come ready to go over them with me for feedback on your notebook practices.
On Wednesday we will also begin designing precision stages for our Michelson interferometer experiment.
And, with luck, I will have sent some post drawings to the shop for fabrication. The luck being: there are good drawings to send on Monday, and the 1/2" stainless rod stock has arrived from McMaster-Carr.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Lab 5 Prep Package Available
Lab 5 Prep Package ... in which you will explore the small angle approximation, analyze your diffraction pattern data, and generate a mechanical drawing.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Lab 4 - Fringes and Interference
Working at the table with Cornell Plates to generate diffraction and interference patterns. Several captured with cell phone cameras are below:
Double slit interference pattern
Airy disk from a round aperture made with a diaphragm
The camera is now working, this is its first fringe from #2 double slit on a Cornell Plate. Below is a slice through the intensity profile that could be used for numerical work:
Lab 4 Materials Available
Lab 4 Plan of the Day
Lab 4 Materials
Self-assessment
On self assessment please record if you want to attend and will commit to open lab on Friday afternoon. I will begin designing a precision mount with those interested. Or play on the table with the optics.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Lab 3 - Proud
Paul, Julian, Cy and Daniel just after finishing their Lab 3 layout of a beam conditioner that reduces the laser beam divergence to less than 0.5 mrad and expands the beam 10x. Nice job guys!
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Lab 3 - 5 October 2009
Lab 3 - Plan of the Day
Lab 3 - Laser Beam Conditioning
Lab Self Assessment
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Lab 3 Prep Package Available
Note that there is a video to view. It is one of the Feynmann New Zealand lectures on QED where he introduces his theory to a lay audience. The link for this 98-minute streaming video is
Feynmann video: Robb Memorial Lectures Part 1: Photons - Corpuscles of Light
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Lab 2 - 30 September 2009
(not the fire extinguisher part)
Lab 2's materials are at these links:
Lab 2A - Optical Table Fundamentals and Component Placement
Physics 492 Self-Assessmment
For convenient downloading you'll need a free Google account. Google is not evil, just demanding.
The class was about the table and putting components on it. We started by getting used to working in gloves with our tools and building up some simple mount bases, then placing them at assigned locations. We finished with full builds of several beam splitters from parts still in their wrappers. A quick design conference between the two teams divided up the table and reached agreements on where beamsplitters will go to provide beam distribution to three separate experiment areas. Here is one of the beam launchers at its assigned location, performing its function. Can you see a piece of Doug?
What, you may ask, is the white and blue stuff? The white is some lens tissue that came with the beamsplitter in its box being used as a compliant load-bearing surface for the beamsplitter to sit on. The tissue in turn is taped down with some small cut pieces of blue painter's tape to keep it from moving as the glass is placed. We don't want metal to touch glass if we can avoid it. Without the paper, the glass would sit right on the anodized aluminum shelf, and very high stresses would be developed at the three (why three?) contact points, leading to microscopic damage. But the paper is compliant - it deforms somewhat - so the load through the glass to the shelf is distributed over some area. It is easy enough to protect the glass in this way (this time!) and a good habit to always be thinking about how the glass is being touched. The beamsplitter cube is held in place by a nylon-tipped set screw threaded through the upper shelf which compresses it against the tissue paper. This set screw must be only snug and not turned down tightly - again to avoid possible damage to the glass.
The layout design conference was an exercise in parallel coordinated work by the two teams. We don't have time (nor inclination necessarily) for everyone to do everything. We need to do some parallel processing. In this case each of the two teams sent 2 representatives to the whiteboard to agree on how to divide the table up and arrange how beams would be delivered to several experiment areas with the beamsplitters. The result:
Lab 3 prep package will be up shortly. Part of the prep will be to watch one of Feynmann's videos. The video itself is over an hour long, so be sure to schedule some time for this. The video is online and streams to your computer like YouTube. Also there will be a narrative with questions for you to work related to the video.
Next week we'll take a little time exploring the concepts in the video and relate them to what is happening on the tabletop.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Michelson Interferometer
After the scheduled class time was over, some of us went over to another lab to take a look at a Michelson interferometer. This is an iPhone photo taken looking upstream at the fringes formed by this interferometer. Everyone was able to safely put their eye at this location and see the fringes for themselves. Safe because the source was an incandescent light with a narrowband filter and a diffusor screen - never look upstream at a laser. We had a lively discussion on how it is that "which-way" ambiguity having to do with the 2 arms of the interferometer and small tilts in the end-of-arm mirrors give rise to these fringes. For example, the presence of 7 fringes means that the two mirrors are misaligned by 7/2 wavelengths from ideal - each half wave gives one fringe - or by (7/2)*500nm = 3.5 microns.
Lab 2 Prep Package Available
Lab 2 Prep Package
Instructions: do the work in the package, recording in your lab notebook. Be prepared to verbally report out at the beginning of class Sep 30.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Lab 1 -- 28 September 2009
Lab 1A - Introduction to Physics 492
Lab 1B - Lab Safety & Fundamentals
Lab Self-Assessment
A simple demo is on the table reproducing Young's double slit experiment. First the laser beam is expanded and collimated through 2 simple lenses to form planar wavefronts / straight rays. The expanded and collimated beam then passes through a glass slide with a double slit inked on it. Then the beam propagates to the end of the table where it illuminates a simple screen to show the classic interference pattern.
Photos taken with an iPhone in low light - handheld and with its autofocus algorithm trying to sharpen edges so they are a little blurry.
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Physics 492 Course Description
PHYSICS 492: Advanced Optics Laboratory
Instructor: David Van Buren
Course goals: (1) gain hands-on experience with optical components and their behaviors; (2) learn your way around an optical table and laser source; (3) become familiar with optical experiment design considerations; (4) construct end-to-end optical systems from source to detector; (5) introduce fiber optics concepts; (6) demonstrate elementary quantum optics principles; (7) attain proficiency using online and downloadable tools for technical work.
Topics will be chosen from:
Safety and care in the optical laboratory
Behavior of basic optical components
Optical materials and mounts
Detectors, cameras, and image data
Optical experiment design tools
Environmental considerations for optics experiments
Optical tolerancing and performance error budgets
Beam expander demonstration
Young’s double slit experiment
Applied diffraction
Fiber optic demonstration
Quantum optics table-top apparatrus
Interferometry and fringe detection
Fourier optics demonstration
Wavefront sensing basic experiment
Prerequisites: Curiosity and a desire to work in a laboratory setting. Familiarity with introductory university optics.
Instructor: Dr. David Van Buren (PhD 1983 UC Berkeley) is an Architect for optical systems at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. He has worked on astronomical telescopes from an amateur-class 6-inch backyard telescope to NASA’s upcoming flagship 6-meter James Webb Space Telescope. He has also worked on a range of optical interferometers from handheld demonstrators made with household items to the spaceborne SIM Lite, which will be used in the search for extrasolar earth-like planets.